News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Alpha by mhd on Friday January 09, 2015 @06:46PM (#8865200)
It's good enough when you can configure it and apply it selectively. If I want to clean up a function in my code base, I can e.g. select it and run "perltidy" over it, which has a configuration dot file for the company code standard (or CPAN guidelines etc.).

Or just clean up some nags so that version control behaves better. But if the only option is not running it at all or having all the code automatically fit to whatever the people On High have deemed to be visually pleasing? Yeah...

Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Alpha by flogic on Friday January 09, 2015 @08:18PM (#8865446)
It's irksome when the auto formatter does something ugly. Though, I think the issue is far worse with Perl tidy. With, gofmt my view is more "I don't like this bit but fuck it." Probably because, Go has much simpler syntax.
Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Alpha by mhd on Saturday January 10, 2015 @05:19AM (#8866482)
Both languages (being bastard children of C) often run into exactly the same problems, where the syntax doesn't differ greatly. If you e.g. are accustomed to having indentation without tabs, margins within function calls or prefer non-tabular variable declarations, you can have that in C, Perl, Pike, Java, etc..