News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by Victorjm on Thursday January 08, 2015 @02:43PM (#8858435)
Full-disclosure: The kickstarter featured here is one I created.

I'd have to agree that if still alive there's no way SJ veer from the path of high-tech. Part of me does wonder however how this would be different if he had been born 30 years later. Being the rebel that he was known for at times, I wouldn't be surprised if the company he'd be starting as a 20 year old in this day in age, would indeed be a lo-tech focused company.

Who knows, maybe starting a company wouldn't even be the "Steve" thing to do right now.

Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by erickaplan on Thursday January 08, 2015 @03:04PM (#8858586)
Sorry but no. Steve Jobs would never made something like this ever. This idea is stupid and weren't you the founder of some Peter-Thiel backed startup? Don't you have better things to spend your time on then make bracelets?
Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by erickaplan on Thursday January 08, 2015 @03:25PM (#8858732)
If there's one thing to learn about Steve jobs it's that people don't know what they want. Having someone buy 500 of something is no indicator of success, try selling $1M and then we'll talk
Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by erickaplan on Thursday January 08, 2015 @03:18PM (#8858672)
Not sure what concept validation has to do with it. The guy is raising $10,000 for a rubber band! Why even do a Kickstarter for this at all?
Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by rileysroberts on Thursday January 08, 2015 @03:23PM (#8858720)
* The guy raised 10k in a day for his "rubber band". Yeah, so dumb, only 500 people have contributed.
Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by rileysroberts on Thursday January 08, 2015 @03:30PM (#8858768)
Really don't think that's the main lesson to learn from Steve, but enjoy your narrow TechCrunch perspective.
Re:The wearable Steve jobs would've made by rileysroberts on Thursday January 08, 2015 @03:16PM (#8858660)
Wow, unnecessarily harsh. It's a KickStater bruh. Concept validation, ever heard about it?