News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Je Suis Charlie by coldtea on Thursday January 08, 2015 @12:32PM (#8857537)
>It seems to me that if you choose to identify as a follower of Mohammed you can't uphold him as a paragon and oppose violence, those positions are contrary.

Well, being contradictory is nothing that ever stopped people (religious or not). For example Jesus was all about piece, yet horrible attrocities have been done in his name by people saying their were for Jesus ideals (e.g. the Spanish Inquisition, the genocide of Latin American indians, etc).

Re:Je Suis Charlie by pbhjpbhj on Friday January 09, 2015 @10:58AM (#8862733)
You can use the New Testament and Jesus own words/actions to criticise the [Spanish] Inquisition whilst you can't do the same with non-abrogated ayahs or by demonstrating the contrast with Mohammed's model of life.

There's documentary evidence, via Wikipedia, to support 1250 being sentenced to death by the Spanish Inquisition over a 200 year period. The monarchy in Spain established that Inquisition: the people were tried for things like witchcraft but also child rape, bestiality and such which are still consider serious crimes today - though seldom is capital punishment legally applied for those crimes now. Interestingly none of the motives mentioned in the Wiki' article is "spreading Christianity": indeed IIRC the Inquisitions apply to those "baptised" in to the Catholic church [albeit baptisms were often under duress of being expelled from Spain it seems].

Whatever atrocities can be pegged on Christians I don't see how that stops the Koran and Mohammed from being supporters of violent persecution however.