I had the idea I'd be able to attract some consulting clients if I answered lots of questions at StackOverflow.
I expect that would work well were I to keep it up, but after just one day of devoted overflowing, I came to the conclusion that my brain would explode were I to persist.
I have quietly accumulated 13k rep on electronics.stackexchange, but I don't think it's much use to me.
However that contract came several years after I answered the question.
To the extent I do stuff like post to stackoverflow, I don't expect it to pay off soon.
I expect that I could stay in the top ten over a long period of time with far less sustained effort.
The reason I didn't persist was that I wasn't able to get anything else done.
This seems to be the bad result of people turning gamification into real world results: you encourage people to pour lots of resources into a metric to get the real world result, which might be a complete waste of time.
Suppose someone posted Fermat's Last Conjecture to Stackoverflow, in hopes of getting advice as to how to prove it. Were someone to produce that proof, they would be demonstrating their superiority to three hundred years of the world's very finest mathematicians.
But yes, my experience is completely correct - to the extent someone looks for stuff like stackoverflow at all, all they want to know is that I've answered something, even if my answer was stupid.
My pet peeve is that online application forms commonly as for my "github". How about my sourceforge? How about the repository that I host myself?
I expect that most of those who request my github don't really know the difference between a github and a hubcap.
I'm too young to feel this nostalgic about websites.
It's not so much that I was nostalgic for fark. Finding its spam in my inbox, reminded me of the love Bonita and I once had.