News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ZFS vs. Hammer by prakashsurya on Friday January 02, 2015 @08:37PM (#8829583)
Could not have said it better myself. It's disappointing to see a post with such unfounded nonsense rated so high on HN.
Re:ZFS vs. Hammer by spydum on Friday January 02, 2015 @08:58PM (#8829622)
To be fair, author did say he shouldn't be considered an expert and his experience was extremely limited.
Re:ZFS vs. Hammer by f2f on Friday January 02, 2015 @10:38PM (#8829842)
i'm sorry but "i'm no expert" is not an excuse for trying to change people's minds. that's how anti-vaxxers are born.
Re:ZFS vs. Hammer by Luyt on Saturday January 03, 2015 @07:08AM (#8830584)
Indeed. This is the "Appeal to Lack of Authority" fallacy [1]

Authority has a reputation for being corrupt and inflexible, and this stereotype has been leveraged by some who assert that their own lack of authority somehow makes them a better authority.

Starling might say of the 9/11 attacks: "Every reputable structural engineer understands how fire caused the Twin Towers to collapse."

Bombo can reply: "I'm not an expert in engineering or anything, I'm just a regular guy asking questions."

Starling: "We should listen to what the people who know what they're talking about have to say."

Bombo: "Someone needs to stand up to these experts."

The idea that not knowing what you're talking about somehow makes you heroic or more reliable is incorrect. More likely, your lack of expertise simply makes you wrong.

[1] http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4217