Clojure 2014 Year in Review

Re:Clojure 2014 Year in Review by psykotic on Friday January 02, 2015 @06:36PM (#8829183)

> The number of languages that I've seen with a proper numeric tower that aren't Scheme (or direct descendants of Scheme like Racket) are zero, so "OO makes it hard to do something almost no one ever does"...?

It doesn't have to be an elaborate Scheme or Common Lisp numeric tower. I mean any kind of lattice ("X and Y gives Z") that would normally be implemented with case analysis. Especially if that lattice has symmetries (e.g. commutativity).

> No problem requires pattern matching, much less on several values

Of course, but I think you know what I mean. Take any of the standard problems that are not amenable to natural forms of cascaded single dispatch. Pattern matching has its own limitations, but sometimes it's the right tool for the job.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clojure 2014 Year in Review by seanmcdirmid on Saturday January 03, 2015 @09:12AM (#8830748)

Pattern matching is overused in Scala, dispatch also works well via trait flexible compositions, which also provide a Wadler compliant solution to the extension/expression problem. But I guess it is a question of taste: Martin's 1000+ line mega match, or my 100 trait solution.

[ Parent | on HN ]