Re:How we made editing Wikipedia twice as fast
by renaudg on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:08PM
(#8816448)
This is cute wishful thinking, but what exactly makes you think that whatever company is behind PHPNG will outlive friggin' Facebook ?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How we made editing Wikipedia twice as fast
by nhtechie on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:23PM
(#8816537)
PHPNG is actually the official next version of PHP. If the PHPNG team is dead that means no active development is being done on PHP (period).
Re:How we made editing Wikipedia twice as fast
by detaro on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:32PM
(#8816581)
If PHPNG dies they simply could elect a different environment to be the official one. Just because PHPNG is "the future" right now doesn't mean the fate of the language is tied to it forever.
Re:How we made editing Wikipedia twice as fast
by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @06:58PM
(#8817508)
It's all well and good labelling HHVM the new official environment, but a lot of existing code does not work on HHVM.
Re:How we made editing Wikipedia twice as fast
by psykovsky on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:22PM
(#8816534)
Facebooks' ties with the NSA spying ring is what makes me think that. Oh, that and showing users their dead relatives pictures surrounded by festive themes around christmas time.
EDIT: I didn't think I would need to mention the obvious reason nhtechie there mentioned. That was my whole point after all, for the ones who understood it before downvoting, but whatever.
Re:How we made editing Wikipedia twice as fast
by scrollaway on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @07:12PM
(#8817577)
You're being downvoted because it's extremely foolish to think that Facebook will collapse due to the dead people on it. My theory is that people don't even know where to start on a rebuttal for such an argument given how absurd it is, so instead, they downvote.