News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What I.Q. doesn't tell you about race by DaniFong on Monday December 10, 2007 @11:24PM (#88083)
I'm surprised you've chosen to point to IQ and the Wealth of Nations. It is not exactly the paragon of scholarship. As has been mentioned before, for the majority of those nations, no study was even available, they extrapolated from neighboring nations. As the result we can posit that the lowest scoring nations (at least those distant from one another) actually had studies, of some sort done (let's not question that validity of said studies for the moment, even though they should hardly count as IQ tests).

Let's examine the neighbors of the five lowest scoring nations:

Zimbabwe, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, Equatorial Guinea.

Each of these nations are fairly distant from one another (ie: at least two hops on the world graph). Yet if you flood fill at a depth of two from each of them, you discover something pretty interesting: nearly all of Africa is filled! These countries were given a score of about 64, a bit more than two SD's below the world average. If an averaging of the scores of nearby nations took place, and it must have by the author's own admission, then the mere presence of these five low scores depresses the scores of the entirety of Africa, and this negative influence spreads all the way to the middle east. There's your consistency.

Re:What I.Q. doesn't tell you about race by mynameishere on Monday December 10, 2007 @11:42PM (#88098)
I'm aware of problems there. (As the wikipedia article discusses.) It's still the best overview, though. I am tempted to say that a country that can't administer a credible IQ test probably doesn't need to.

Actually, the African countries aren't of serious concern. [1] Rather, the disparities between developing countries' current wealth and predicted wealth based upon current IQ have their uses:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=FEMKX&t=my&l=off&...

[1] The "are black people less intelligent?" question is actually pretty trivial, and has very few practical applications.

Re:What I.Q. doesn't tell you about race by DaniFong on Monday December 10, 2007 @11:49PM (#88103)
Trivial? You have to define black, you have to define intelligent, and if the answer happens to be an unorderable set, you have to define _less_.

I'm unconvinced that they're measuring generated wealth by IQ, either. Most of the administered tests weren't IQ tests, they were educational tests. They measured the standard deviation of the _nation's_ mean, and then mapped that to an IQ. The correlation thus isn't a direct one between IQ and generated wealth, but rather between educational performance and wealth. More obvious, this one is.