News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Would You Bet $100M on Your Pet Programming Language? (2007) by desdiv on Saturday December 27, 2014 @07:56PM (#8804652)
None of the primitive data structures will match up. JVM languages, CLR languages, Rust, Go, et al all have array bound checking, so their arrays won't be compatible with C libraries without a wrapper.
Re:Would You Bet $100M on Your Pet Programming Language? (2007) by kibwen on Saturday December 27, 2014 @09:53PM (#8804972)
Rust arrays are perfectly compatible with C arrays, they're both just contiguous segments of memory with elements at fixed offsets. You can pass Rust arrays to C functions trivially, and bounds checking has nothing to do with it.

I should also note that all correct C code does bounds checking somewhere. The difference with languages that are bounds-checked by default is that they pessimistically assume that you haven't checked the bound manually, and so can potentially do more bounds checking than is strictly necessary if their optimizers aren't capable of hoisting out the checks.

Re:Would You Bet $100M on Your Pet Programming Language? (2007) by NateDad on Sunday December 28, 2014 @02:34PM (#8807140)
Ditto for go arrays.