News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The limits of my language are the limits of my world (2011) by mc32 on Tuesday December 23, 2014 @03:50PM (#8790136)
What does this say about the Chinese language, then? Chinese has approx 10,000 words in regular usage. Does the apparent low word count have an impact on thinking? It would appear to me that the relatively low word count (ideographs) has not impeded Chinese from thinking about the world around them in a negative way...
Re:The limits of my language are the limits of my world (2011) by SiVal on Tuesday December 23, 2014 @05:46PM (#8790650)
Chinese characters aren't what speakers of Western languages would consider "words". Like English words, they are symbols combining both meaning and pronunciation (one or slightly more of each), so sometimes they are like English words, but more often they are used in fixed combinations with each other making them more like roots and affixes (prefixes, infixes, suffixes).

Chinese characters are more like the four components of the word "nonbiological" (non, bio, logos, al) than like the word "nonbiological" itself but, unlike English, there are more cases where the components can also stand alone.

Ten thousand is on the high side for the number of characters an educated, native Chinese speaker would usually know (much less use), but the number of what Westerners might consider "words" known by such a Chinese speaker would typically be much higher than 10,000, with most of them being composites of multiple characters.

Re:The limits of my language are the limits of my world (2011) by e3xu on Tuesday December 23, 2014 @05:28PM (#8790581)
In practice, the Chinese language typically represents concepts in 2 or 4 ideograph segments. Not every possible combination is in regular usage, but the number of potential linguistic "words" is closer in order of magnitude to the 10000 choose 2 binomial coefficient, i.e. 49995000.
Re:The limits of my language are the limits of my world (2011) by mc32 on Tuesday December 23, 2014 @07:08PM (#8790917)
So basically when they don't have a word for a new concept they devise a new one made of existing radical+ideograph+ideograph.