News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Orangutan Has Some Human Rights, Argentine Court Rules by throwaway90999 on Tuesday December 23, 2014 @02:39PM (#8789795)
The vast majority of humanity still depends on domesticated animals for labor and food. Goats are very commonly used to convert inedible wild plants into human ingestible calories in impoverished regions who do not have modern factory farming infrastructure.

Certainly we can find other philosophical approaches which are more reasonable.

Re:An Orangutan Has Some Human Rights, Argentine Court Rules by waps on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @10:56AM (#8793229)
I wonder how this reasoning applies to human foetuses ... If the argument that killing is a necessity for free-er sex is judged to be moral, then how could you possibly judge against someone killing for survival ? Hell, how could you possible hold killing for fun against someone ?

(not taking a position, just pointing out the massive inconsistency)