You have to wonder, sometime around when you typed the word "menstruation" into a comment on Hacker News about job interviews, did any kind of warning light go on in your head saying "maybe I'm off in the weeds here"?
I have a really neat-o idea. How about we interview people based on their ability to actually perform a task, and then set, oh, I don't know, a 5-10 day limit to the number of allowable personal days in a year? We don't even have to give the women more of those days, despite their children and special times of the month. Hell, if we're worried that they're going to exploit their personal days to take care of sick children, we can just reduce the number of days.
Then we never have to talk about this issue in interviews or, god willing, on Hacker News again. I think that's a win. What do you think?
http://www.allbusiness.com/human-resources/employee-developm...
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-211-x/2009000/part-partie1-e...
Not all female absenteeism is due to children. Menstruation also plays a significant role (as evidenced by a 28-day periodic spike in absenteeism for women):
http://www.nber.org/papers/w12369