News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by tensor on Thursday December 18, 2014 @03:51PM (#8769550)
People here have a problem with it because it is a technically poor solution, even among nosql databases. The main problems are:

1. Historically mongodb was distributed with completely unsafe defaults. It was insane to use it with any data you actually cared about. Once you toggle on the safety features most of the vaunted performance goes away.

2. It doesn't actually scale that well despite claims that it does.

The fact that there are better nosql solutions just make people further annoyed. It's basically the cargo cult behaviour of mongodb proponents that people don't like.

Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by palmer_eldritch on Friday December 19, 2014 @04:22AM (#8771569)
Basically what you're saying is that mongodb is the mysql of nosql databases right?
Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by threeseed on Thursday December 18, 2014 @05:52PM (#8770139)
You know what I don't like. People who complain about technologies they've never used.

1. This was NEVER an issue for 99.999% of people. The drivers all had the default set to FSYNC_SAFE.

2. It DOES scale the way it claims. It just doesn't have unlimited scalability and guess what no product does.

Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by angrybits on Thursday December 18, 2014 @06:25PM (#8770282)
1. So then the problem they had was they didn't get the performance they expected since the benchmarks were done with different settings to juice the numbers? There is no upside to arguing this one, Mongo loses one way or the other. Can't play them both.

2. I haven't seen anyone say that Mongo scales in an unlimited fashion. You said that. I think what they might be saying is that it doesn't scale well enough to pay for the trade-offs from using it. If you aren't running a system that can be composed of somewhat-interrelated documents, you're gonna have a bad time.

Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by justrudd on Thursday December 18, 2014 @06:51PM (#8770383)
All the drivers default to FSYNC_SAFE? Maybe the Java one didn't get the memo. It's set to ACKNOWLEDGED by default.

https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-java-driver/blob/master/src...

I like Mongo. And until I really learned about it, I got bitten by the default a few times. Personally I use REPLICA_ACKNOWLEDGED when running in a cluster and FSYNC when writing to a single node.

Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by threeseed on Thursday December 18, 2014 @08:26PM (#8770729)
At the time when the big uproar of the lack of fsyncing by default the Java driver had it set as FSYNC_SAFE (there was no ACKNOWLEDGED).
Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by norkakn on Thursday December 18, 2014 @08:02PM (#8770638)
2 is wrong. Mongos shits all over itself after only a few nodes and moderate traffic. It's balancing is incredibly broken and will kill a small cluster very quickly.

Source: tried to use it at scale

Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by threeseed on Thursday December 18, 2014 @08:21PM (#8770712)
The balancing is broken if you use an inappropriate sharding key. Which is no different to every other system.

And I've used it under very high load with zero problems other than data model changes.

Re:PostgreSQL 9.4 Released by norkakn on Thursday December 18, 2014 @08:32PM (#8770744)
I think we had one of the larger mongo installs around, so you just might not have been at the scale to see these issues.