News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by GFK_of_xmaspast on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @07:59AM (#8762117)
What do you think an appropriate response is?
Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by kyberias on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @08:53AM (#8762266)
The appropriate response is to immediately start thinking why you need to figure out a response to any low-quality joke people make. Maybe, just maybe, there is absolutely no need to make any response whatever. Think about it.
Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by ANTSANTS on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @08:16AM (#8762161)
I think if people would stop pretending to be offended by ridiculous things, the problem would solve itself and we wouldn't need to have a "response" in the first place.
Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by Igglyboo on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @08:47AM (#8762248)
Nothing because it's quite obviously a joke.
Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by jpitz on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @08:14AM (#8762154)
How about public shaming instead of the destruction of a career?
Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by CamperBob2 on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @04:32PM (#8764492)
That's the idea. Any developer or researcher who uses obscure or meaningless names like "P" and "V" needs to be publicly shamed for it, no matter how well-respected they are. Clarity is vital in this business.

Or were you talking about Linus?

Re:Linus Torvalds on semaphores (1999) by ANTSANTS on Wednesday December 17, 2014 @09:58AM (#8762440)
They're one and the same in this witch-hunt culture.