News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Good News You May Have Missed in 2014 by chii on Tuesday December 16, 2014 @02:36AM (#8756195)
doing an X-prize style competition will probably cause a lot of "wastage" in resources spent by other contestents that _almost_ get the cure, but didn't make it. It will mean that only those who _know_ they have the cure (or it's within reach) would invest in it, and hence, won't get cures for diseases for which we don't know much about. I reckon better way is to have publically funded labs that do the lions share of research, budget split by how common the disease is.
Re:Good News You May Have Missed in 2014 by twoodfin on Tuesday December 16, 2014 @08:51AM (#8757070)
I reckon better way is to have publically funded labs that do the lions share of research, budget split by how common the disease is.

What incentive would any of those labs have to spend their budgets efficiently?

Re:Good News You May Have Missed in 2014 by chii on Thursday December 18, 2014 @01:04AM (#8766188)
How do you measure efficiency in research? If you use a commercial success metric - then drugs (or things in general) that aren't profitable because they target the most poor/vulnerable people don't get into consideration.