Re:Hyphen Hate? When Amazon went to war against punctuation
by shreve on Monday December 15, 2014 @10:38AM
(#8752471)
Yes. What they were going for was "red head-scarf", but that is also questionable. I've only ever seen "head scarf" unhyphenated.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hyphen Hate? When Amazon went to war against punctuation
by dghf on Monday December 15, 2014 @10:52AM
(#8752560)
I can't remember where I came across it (possibly Gowers' Plain Words), but I like the rule that you should hyphenate to avoid ambiguity but not otherwise. E.g. is "a red head scarf" a red scarf for the head or a scarf for red heads? From context, it should be obvious, but hyphenating "head scarf" would make it explicit. (Of course, you could always avoid the problem entirely by using "headscarf" instead.)
There are some exceptions: e.g., I've read you should always write "Douglas-fir" instead of "Douglas fir" because it's not actually a fir.
Re:Hyphen Hate? When Amazon went to war against punctuation
by aoloe on Monday December 15, 2014 @11:25AM
(#8752732)
If you need an hyphen to make clear what a "read head scarf" is, shouldn't you rewrite your sentence?
Re:Hyphen Hate? When Amazon went to war against punctuation
by GhotiFish on Monday December 15, 2014 @01:18PM
(#8753389)
Well I don't know if this is right, but if I had to guess
red-head scarf might suggest that the flairs at the end of the scarf are red, and that it just a normal scarf https://www.google.ca/search?safe=off&tbm=isch
where as a red head-scarf would be a red... head scarf. https://www.google.ca/search?q=head+scarf&tbm=isch
Dunno. Needs more context frankly.