News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Public and private sector efficiency by ah- on Saturday December 13, 2014 @01:07PM (#8745796)
Written by the EPSU, from the last page:

EPSU is the European Federation of Public Service Unions. It is the largest federation of the ETUC and comprises 8 million public service workers from over 275 trade unions; EPSU organises workers in the energy, water and waste sectors, health and social services and local and national administration, in all European countries including in the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood.

Re:Public and private sector efficiency by bildung on Saturday December 13, 2014 @01:31PM (#8745871)
Well sure, I'd be surprised if the Cato Institute would have published that ;)

It apparently is just a publication covering the results of several meta-analytical studies, EPSU neither did studies themselves nor seemed to have been involved in those mentioned in the publication. The real content starts at page 7.

edit:typo

Re:Public and private sector efficiency by bjterry on Saturday December 13, 2014 @08:59PM (#8747205)
The problem is that because of their obvious bias, we can have no assurance that they are accurately surveying all of the available meta-analyses, and that they are properly representing the information and its level of certainty.
Re:Public and private sector efficiency by bakhy on Monday December 15, 2014 @07:22AM (#8751612)
That is true, but one should still give it a read, instead of dismissing it as lies just because it was commissioned by a union.

Some pretty interesting stuff is included, from very interesting sources, pretty certainly not pro-worker biased.

And ultimately, if public-private partnerships, privatizations and the like were consistently good, it would be a struggle to find studies that do not corroborate this. Here we have a tonne of studies from various sources, none finding these fabled results.

Re:Public and private sector efficiency by bakhy on Saturday December 13, 2014 @07:04PM (#8746981)
"Moreover, many of these studies have been carried out by economists expecting to confirm a theoretical argument that privatisation is intrinsically more efficient, which makes the results more striking. The evidence contradicts the assumptions." (p. 6)