FoundationDB and the New NoSQL

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by IndianAstronaut on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:28AM (#8745487)

Couchdb is a NoSQL store that is ACID.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by lmorris84 on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:31AM (#8745495)

Is it? The front page of CouchDB says "CouchDB is highly available and partition tolerant, but is also eventually consistent"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by IndianAstronaut on Saturday December 13, 2014 @12:07PM (#8745614)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by robertszkutak on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:40AM (#8745520)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by misframer on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:32AM (#8745499)

IIRC you can't update multiple documents atomically.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by tedsmith on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:43AM (#8745531)

I’m only aware of one NoSQL database that could do multi-document /multi-collection transactions.

ArangoDB (document database)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by amirouche on Saturday December 13, 2014 @12:16PM (#8745643)

Oracle Berkeley DB, wiredtiger, lmdb, titandb, neo4j and orientdb.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FoundationDB and the New NoSQL by ddorian43 on Saturday December 13, 2014 @11:47AM (#8745541)

postgresql xc / postgresql xl

[ Parent | on HN ]