News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Relic And Hortonworks See Strong Public Debuts by zdrummond on Friday December 12, 2014 @02:02PM (#8742009)
I am super happy user of New Relic, but always interested in alternatives. I had never heard of AppNeta, so I checked it out.

Looks like you guys have some nice stuff, but do you mind if I give a new customer first impression?

Very confusing pricing.

First off, right off the bat. There is no central price page and I had to go hunt for what you charge.

Then when I did find Enterprise pricing for TraceView, it has some contradictory language. It says $119/host/month. Then in the bullets below it says

unlimited users

unlimited applications

unlimited hosts

Huh? Is it per host or is it per month?? That makes no sense to me.

Re:New Relic And Hortonworks See Strong Public Debuts by trjordan on Friday December 12, 2014 @03:05PM (#8742386)
Hey, sorry that you find it confusing!

Part of the problem is that we have a couple different products, and they're not all directly comparable with New Relic. Hence the lack of a central pricing page.

TraceView is our offer that's 1:1, as you found, and it's priced monthly per host. The "unlimited" is meant to be "you can buy as many as you want", vs. the "Startup" plan, where you can have a max of 5 hosts. Does that make more sense? (I'd be more than happy to change it to something that makes more sense!)

Re:New Relic And Hortonworks See Strong Public Debuts by zdrummond on Friday December 12, 2014 @04:06PM (#8742688)
Why charge me for having more hosts? I am used to the reverse. Buy more, save more.

IMHO, keep the app and 'hours of retention' limit in. Remove the hosts and user limit (I hate user limits; don't you want more people exposed to your app?!?)

Re:New Relic And Hortonworks See Strong Public Debuts by trjordan on Friday December 12, 2014 @08:36PM (#8743738)
We definitely have discounts if you've got a whole ton of hosts. You'll pay less for the 50th host than for the 1st.

That said, a host collects a certain amount of data, so it's not really tenable for us to sell "site licenses" at a fair price. If you're super-bursty, we're happy to charge for the average, AWS-style, but that model tends to upset the finance folks, so we default to the "you'll clearly pay this" model first.