Re:The bad side of systemd: two recent systemd failures
by cma on Friday December 12, 2014 @01:09PM
(#8741698)
Anti-fragility isn't the same as robustness. It should rarely be used as a term.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The bad side of systemd: two recent systemd failures
by bkeroack on Saturday December 13, 2014 @01:02AM
(#8744357)
I'm not even sure how any software could be described (accurately) as anti-fragile. Robust, yes. But anti-fragility indicates that performance improves with stressors or catastrophic/unexpected events.