News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientific Peer Review Is Broken – Fighting to Fix It wit... by daemonk on Thursday December 11, 2014 @05:35AM (#8734082)
Anonymity is hard in practice when so much of science consist of small niche fields where it can be pretty obvious who the author of a paper is by just reading the content.

A better solution might be to enforce non-anonymous peer-reviews that can be read by the public after the paper has been published.

Re:Scientific Peer Review Is Broken – Fighting to Fix It wit... by tnhh on Thursday December 11, 2014 @06:13AM (#8734181)
Some venues are doing this, e.g. f1000. Here's a paper that I reviewed: http://f1000research.com/articles/3-38/v2