Re:Scientific Peer Review Is Broken – Fighting to Fix It wit...
by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday December 10, 2014 @08:13PM
(#8732684)
> because their comment is anonymous to the author and won't be available to the readers
You can make comments on your papers available; there is nothing against that. I really think, however, peer review comments should actually be published with rejected and accepted papers (at the author's consent, not reviewers) so that conferences can be more transparent.
You can make comments on your papers available; there is nothing against that. I really think, however, peer review comments should actually be published with rejected and accepted papers (at the author's consent, not reviewers) so that conferences can be more transparent.