News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Senate Report on CIA Detention and Interrogation Program by dragonwriter on Wednesday December 10, 2014 @03:29PM (#8731480)
This is not entirely correct; the US is not a party to the Rome Statute, true, but it in fact Bill Clinton did sign the Rome Statute, but it was never submitted for ratification, and George W. Bush's administration sent a note purporting to retract the signature (as a means of avoid obligations that attach to signatories to treaties even prior to ratification under the Vienna Convention on Treaties, specifically, the obligation not to work to undermine the treaty's purpose.)

The US has engaged more positively (but without any moves toward ratification or even retracting the purported retraction of its signature) with the ICC under the Obama Administration.

Re:US Senate Report on CIA Detention and Interrogation Program by wfn on Wednesday December 10, 2014 @04:02PM (#8731670)
Thanks for providing these details. (I didn't even know that Bill Clinton did actually sign the statute, even though it was effectively retracted (if only via (GWB) sending a note purporting to retract the signature, as I take it.))
Re:US Senate Report on CIA Detention and Interrogation Program by CWuestefeld on Friday December 12, 2014 @10:17AM (#8740421)
I'm not sure what the president's signature, or retraction of signature, should be expected to mean. The key is its ratification by the Senate.