I think one of the problems reading the critique is that her points are buried in too much ranting and wild exaggerations, so it's off-putting.

The approach is good for politicking (soundbites and getting the choir feverish) but it takes from presenting reasonable ideas for regular people to consider and process and say, yeah, that makes sense, or no, that's not quite the way i see it.

That said, one approach garners thought conversation, the other garners lots more clicks.