News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:World's top 100 universities listed by unalone on Thursday October 08, 2009 @12:57PM (#869397)
Other people will respond if they have something to say. Isn't that how it always works?

Your current comment is the exact same as your other comment. You edited that one, then deleted it as it got voted down. I believe that you didn't do it for karma, but still it was silly.

Re:World's top 100 universities listed by xiaoma on Thursday October 08, 2009 @01:28PM (#869470)
Look, I delete all kinds of unfinished or mis-entered things on the computer all the time, including emails, comments, blog entries and pages in employee training manuals. Why leave something up that's in error?

When I was writing my comment originally, I wrote the first line, tabbed over to the article to get the quote and tabbed back to this site and saw that I couldn't submit the comment. I hit the back arrow and then cut and paste my quote into the comment. Then I saw a comment was already there, cursed the fact that light accidental taps on my ASUS laptop's mouse pad get interpreted as clicks, deleted my comment and posted the corrected version. It was then that I saw a response to the [deleted]. Then I refreshed and finally saw the multiple downvotes and your comment along with odd insinuations about my personal motivations.

The cruftiness of the delete functionality and the entire... fuck it. This is just pissing me off. Forget it.

Re:World's top 100 universities listed by unalone on Thursday October 08, 2009 @03:25PM (#869738)
What I mean is: Why did you delete it after you'd already edited the original comment? I'm curious.
Re:World's top 100 universities listed by xiaoma on Monday October 12, 2009 @12:56PM (#877132)
I had intended to delete it, not edit it.

Not too long ago, I had an unpleasant situation in which I was locked from editing my own comment. That's why I don't have much confidence in the edit feature. I hadn't realized how the delete feature also sucked until this thread.