News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There are no good constant-time data structures by NeutronBoy on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @06:04PM (#8690690)
This is suggested every time timing attacks are discussed. This is not a good mitigation. It increases the number of requests required to complete a timing attack, but in the end all of your rand() calls average out and you still see timing differences.
Re:There are no good constant-time data structures by cousin_it on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @07:21PM (#8691061)
OK, then why not have the sensitive operation always take 100ms? If it finishes early, just sleep until the 100ms mark.
Re:There are no good constant-time data structures by daveloyall on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @07:27PM (#8691090)
And in case it takes more than 100ms or a widely variable amount of time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8691076