News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by lotsofmangos on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @05:11PM (#8690323)
The UK was a model of privatisation of public enterprise.

Only it turns out that a hell of a lot of the companies that bought stuff like the utilities and railways are actually the public enterprises of other countries.

So 20 of the UK rail lines are still publicly owned and run, just by another countries public sector, while our own is banned by law from bidding.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/revealed-how...

Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by dghf on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @07:02PM (#8690981)
Indeed. The only UK rail franchise still in public hands is also the only one that makes money for the state rather than requiring a public subsidy.

So, with impeccable logic, the government has privatised it.

Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by lotsofmangos on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @07:59PM (#8691212)
Presumably, while in public hands though profitable, it has not been paying dividends.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if some of our services eventually get renationalised through a legal challenge based on competition law opening up the bidding again, as the whole logic breaks down rather completely at the point at which you try and fix it by banning any foreign publicly owned industry from bidding, then realise that you have knocked out most of the best qualified bids.

Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by dghf on Wednesday December 03, 2014 @05:22AM (#8692882)
> Presumably, while in public hands though profitable, it has not been paying dividends.

But it has been returning money to its "shareholder", the government, which is kind of analogous.

Re:NASA: We're sending humans to Mars by lotsofmangos on Thursday December 04, 2014 @04:10AM (#8698455)
I was being cynical. While profits are going to the government it is hard to line your own pockets through buying shares, or get appointed to the board after leaving office.