Re:Nasty Lockup Issue Still Being Investigated for Linux 3.18
by kasabali on Monday December 01, 2014 @05:06PM
(#8684220)
> Versus xfs: better at handling power loss/crashes (no "trailing zeroes problem")
I heard they fixed it in 2012. Actually there have been a lot of developments in XFS since 2011, I'm not really interested in filesystems but you should have a look at it again if you're interested.
Re:Nasty Lockup Issue Still Being Investigated for Linux 3.18
by 0x0 on Monday December 01, 2014 @08:31AM
(#8680810)
Ext4 seems to support online growing resize (although needs offline to shrink). Didn't ext3 or ext4 also add directory hashing?
Re:Nasty Lockup Issue Still Being Investigated for Linux 3.18
by feld on Monday December 01, 2014 @01:25PM
(#8682706)
reiserfsck used to be a game of russian roulette -- it either sort-of works and you can mount your filesystem, or it eats all your data.
I can't say I'd trust my data on it these days.
I use ZFS where I can, but for root filesystems on linux machines reiser still seems like the best tradeoff.