Re:Alan Kay on the Meaning of “Object-Oriented Programming” ...
by tailrecursion on Sunday November 30, 2014 @04:43PM
(#8678237)
If we redefine the word "OOP:object" to mean process-with-mailbox, and redefine the word "OOP:message" to mean asynchronous message passing, then objects and messages make sense and are useful.
Those are not Smalltalk's definitions -- even though I think you're right on about Alan Kay's original inspiration -- and confusion can arise if we redefine terms.
Those are not Smalltalk's definitions -- even though I think you're right on about Alan Kay's original inspiration -- and confusion can arise if we redefine terms.