News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Swiss reject additional immigration curbs by ScottBurson on Sunday November 30, 2014 @03:15PM (#8677920)
I do seem to recall that we've had propositions in California that were conditionally tied to each other -- Prop. N specifically says it takes effect only if Prop. N - 1 fails, or something like that -- so I think this kind of problem can be addressed, if the initiative drafters do their work well.

A bigger problem, in my opinion, is that a bare majority is sufficient to amend the state Constitution. I think at least a 60% supermajority should be required.

Re:Swiss reject additional immigration curbs by dragonwriter on Sunday November 30, 2014 @03:24PM (#8677957)
I think a bare majority for State Constitutional amendments is fine -- but it should be a majority for the same proposal in two elections a year apart.