News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Object Oriented Programming is Inherently Harmful by noblethrasher on Sunday November 30, 2014 @12:25PM (#8677343)
So far, it seems that a well-designed OO language can get you closer to the best of both worlds than if you start from ML-style functional languages.

Consider that C# let's you have all three of your essentials:

It doesn't have higher-kinded types, but it does have monad comprehensions (LINQ + SelectMany)… the special syntax is nice but not necessary.

It has type classes in the form of implicit conversions.

It has modules in the form of static classes.

C# even lets you do Smalltalk-style OO without too much fuss.

The biggest problem with C# and pethaps OO in general is the lack of intellectual curiosity.

Re:Object Oriented Programming is Inherently Harmful by dllthomas on Sunday November 30, 2014 @03:45PM (#8678011)
"It has type classes in the form of implicit conversions."

Could you expand on this?