News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Testing Legal Highs Would Save Lives by acconrad on Saturday November 29, 2014 @08:11PM (#8675629)
So one thing I can't rationalize is that people claim to be users of a drug, but are you doing independent purity tests yourself? I mean you take LSD and yet you're part of the same pool presumably that doesn't necessarily have access to the purity information of the drugs you're consuming.

Not knowing the purity and the fact that I can be extremely neurotic/overly analytical just immediately worries me that I'll have a bad trip and cause irreparable psychological damage. Is there anything to be said about the psychological effects of these drugs? Sometimes I feel like when they assess "safe" they're assessing this from a toxicological perspective only, and not on the psychological well-being of the people who are consuming them.

Re:Testing Legal Highs Would Save Lives by Taek on Sunday November 30, 2014 @01:12AM (#8676151)
Unfortunately, we are not able to be certain about the quality of the drug we are taking. We buy from the Silk Road (well, Agora now I guess - still waiting for things to calm down), where we read reviews and base our decisions on the gossip posted by other users.

Something about our current batch seems off, everyone's been having weird trips. Despite this red flag, we've taken over 2/3 of the batch. You can't be 100% certain doing testing-at-home either, because there are inert compounds that will test positive for LSD - a careful dealer can fake the test results.

And it's a damn shame, because if you are uncertain about the quality of your substance, those doubts will amplify throughout your trip (that is the nature of psychedelics), and every little effect that you aren't expecting will cause a flurry of uncertainty.

Re:Testing Legal Highs Would Save Lives by chris_wot on Sunday November 30, 2014 @04:03AM (#8676401)
Why are you speaking of yourself using the royal pronoun?
Re:Testing Legal Highs Would Save Lives by psychometry on Sunday November 30, 2014 @05:52AM (#8676535)
...also known as the first-person plural pronoun. It's a common feature of the English language.
Re:Testing Legal Highs Would Save Lives by chris_wot on Tuesday December 02, 2014 @03:15PM (#8689550)
Only amongst the pompous.
Re:Testing Legal Highs Would Save Lives by Alex3917 on Saturday November 29, 2014 @09:25PM (#8675754)
LSD is the one drug where if your test kit shows you have the actual substance, then contamination isn't really an issue. There are only a handful of drugs that are active in the dose levels that fit on a square of blotter paper, and if the blotter has actual LSD on it then the chances of someone bulking it out with something else are basically zero.

Basically the risk of getting 25x-NBOMe or DOx instead of LSD is very high, but the risk of getting NBOMe mixed with LSD is negligible.