News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 64-bit ARM Kernel Development Demo on a Nexus 9. Parent comment

Re:64-bit ARM Kernel Development Demo on a Nexus 9 by sandGorgon on Tuesday November 25, 2014 @01:18AM (#8656592)
could you elaborate on what you mean by "cleaning the drivers" ?

I'm really curious, because it seems that Android has built an architecture where vendor supplied drivers (binary blobs?) can be dropped in without too much changes. But upstream linux needs a considerable amount of rework to "absorb" a driver.

Is this deliberate (the same reason why GCC is obfuscated) or is there a technical reason behind it ?

Because Android Linux works on thousands of different platforms with a lot of stability - I'm beginning to think that the Android driver model is superior... and perhaps mainstream Linux would do well to move to that.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:64-bit ARM Kernel Development Demo on a Nexus 9 by mcpherrinm on Tuesday November 25, 2014 @03:34AM (#8656869)
I work on an embedded Linux device. Sometimes, we do whatever nasty hack we need to make this kernel work on that device -- but those changes aren't portable, aren't maintainable, and don't meet the quality requirements to be in the upstream tree.

There can also be a perception it's "a waste of time" since "nobody will run another kernel on this anyways"

[ Parent | on HN ]