You can’t get entangled without a wormhole (2013)

Re:You can’t get entangled without a wormhole (2013) by evanb on Friday November 21, 2014 @12:43AM (#8639980)

While GP's example is not what happens in QM (Bell's inequality shows that the state of the two coins is not predetermined-but-secret), it is akin to that example, in the sense that because each person gets a random (though correlated) bit, they cannot transmit information to one another.

Bell's inequality is a statement about the possible strength of the correlation, rather than about information transmission.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You can’t get entangled without a wormhole (2013) by pfortuny on Friday November 21, 2014 @06:18AM (#8640776)

Exactly. It is important to note that there is no information exchange if you do not have any information at all.

BTW: why did internet explorer just capitalize Exchange without my asking?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:You can’t get entangled without a wormhole (2013) by ep103 on Friday November 21, 2014 @10:07AM (#8641559)

spell check, exchange is a microsoft product.

[ Parent | on HN ]