> Windows? Wasn't really even an option... until 20 years later.
Which 'Windows'? Before Windows 2000, there was Windows and Windows NT, the former being a more-or-less just a shell running on top of DOS.
Which 'Windows'? Before Windows 2000, there was Windows and Windows NT, the former being a more-or-less just a shell running on top of DOS.
is also a current story on HN.
Just an example of how powerful that simple 70's Unix is. Allows features that appear "magical" to thorsten, anyway.
Windows? Wasn't really even an option... until 20 years later. And, of course, Unix really isn't that good, either. But, before you ignore it, please come to feature parity, at least.