Re:New Search Strategy for Firefox
by bjz_ on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:16PM
(#8633332)
Firefox was great, but the performance was sub-par around version 3, and the time between releases was measured in years, not weeks. Chrome definitely gave Mozilla a nice kick in the backside, which I am very thankful for. These days Firefox is now close to, if not faster and less memory hungry than Chrome.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> Firefox was great, but the performance was sub-par around version 3
Before Chrome, Firefox's performance was sub-par compared to... what? Definitely not to Safari, Chrome, or IE.The main knock on Firefox at that time was that it was too memory-hungry. That was always somewhat of an inaccurate rap. Not totally undeserved, but not totally deserved either.
> Chrome definitely gave Mozilla a nice kick in the backside, which I am very thankful for. These days Firefox is now close to, if not faster and less memory hungry than Chrome.
Heck yes to all of that.
Re:New Search Strategy for Firefox
by ultramancool on Thursday November 20, 2014 @08:45AM
(#8635637)
> Heck yes to all of that.
The performance improvements have been great, but I have to admit the UI changes are highly concerning to me. Fortunately the FF extension APIs are the best around, so now I just can't use Firefox without "Classic Theme Restorer".
Re:New Search Strategy for Firefox
by yellowapple on Thursday November 20, 2014 @03:26PM
(#8637939)
I personally never minded Australis, since I've been used to it via Thunderbird (which rolled it out first). That said, it really doesn't affect me that much since I use Tree View Tabs anyway (and I don't use the menu enough to really care beyond having nice big buttons to click on when my morning coffee hasn't kicked in yet).