Re:Ask HN: Why do people believe “PHP developer” means secur...
by sarciszewski on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @08:07PM
(#8627560)
When something becomes more resilient the more it is damaged, it can be said to be antifragile.
However, a closed source product that is engineered centrally still has elements of fragility contained within it that you will not find in decentralized approaches. In the very long-run, antifragility wins over robust yet fragile systems.
That is one reason why I will consider GNU/Linux and BSD to be more secure than Windows. In the long run.
However, a closed source product that is engineered centrally still has elements of fragility contained within it that you will not find in decentralized approaches. In the very long-run, antifragility wins over robust yet fragile systems.
That is one reason why I will consider GNU/Linux and BSD to be more secure than Windows. In the long run.