Re:Judge threatens contempt for declining to reveal cellphon...
by madaxe_again on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @04:37PM
(#8626514)
If you bothered to RTFA, it's not stingray.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge threatens contempt for declining to reveal cellphon...
by noedig on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @05:07PM
(#8626687)
"Defense attorney Joshua Insley still believes that police used a stingray to find Taylor. He cited a letter in which prosecutors said they were prohibited by the Department of Justice from disclosing information about methods used in their investigation.
The portable device was developed for the military to help zero in on cellphones. It mimics a cellphone tower to force nearby phones to connect to it.
Records shows that the Baltimore Police Department purchased a stingray for $133,000 in 2009."
Re:Judge threatens contempt for declining to reveal cellphon...
by kevin_thibedeau on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @08:32PM
(#8627662)
It is quite likely that there are passive devices that monitor cell phone channels without tricking them into connecting to a phony base station. These technically wouldn't be "stingrays". That is basically what the SIGINT satellites do. It could certainly be miniaturized for local area monitoring. In any case, the cell providers have basic details of what phones communicate with their towers. It doesn't seem like that avenue wasn't used in this case though.
Re:Judge threatens contempt for declining to reveal cellphon...
by madaxe_again on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:02AM
(#8629126)
I think it's more probable that they're covering their corporate friends, who have agreed to supply consumer data illegally. Were they using a stingray, they probably would have said as much.
Re:Judge threatens contempt for declining to reveal cellphon...
by differentView on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @05:12PM
(#8626716)
Sure, if you take the word of the detective possibly covering up illegal actions.