News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mosaic plots: responsive, flexbox-based parts-to-whole vi... by mapcar on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @12:40PM (#8625074)
I understand there have been studies showing people don't estimate angles as well as linear distances but people go too far out of their way to avoid pie charts when parts within whole data is shown. The 1D mosaic plot is effectively a stacked bar chart but there I suspect there is also some bias given toward the largest component such that the relative proportions of the smaller components are not well discriminated.
Re:Mosaic plots: responsive, flexbox-based parts-to-whole vi... by lynaghk on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @01:52PM (#8625545)
Stephen Few has an excellent overview of why pie charts should be avoided: http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intel...

Neither pies nor mosaic charts should be used if you need exact readings of the data --- though mosaic plots do have the advantage of being rectangular, making segments much easier to label with values than the segments of pie charts.

Re:Mosaic plots: responsive, flexbox-based parts-to-whole vi... by Gravityloss on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @03:05PM (#8625990)
I disagree partly. It's easier to estimate relative shares of a total from a pie chart compared to his linear examples.
Re:Mosaic plots: responsive, flexbox-based parts-to-whole vi... by amalag on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @03:59PM (#8626313)
I am also not so convinced. I still like a simple pie-chart.