Re:Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the...
by seryoiupfurds on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @12:05PM
(#8624858)
If the user typed www.mybank.com, let the server redirect to https but don't show the lock icon if it's self-signed. This is no worse than an impostor that just doesn't redirect to https.
If the user typed https://www.mybank.com, show the usual warning for self-signed certificates.
Re:Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the...
by handsomeransoms on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @06:59PM
(#8627246)
How many people are careful to type "https" every time they visit a website? How many people pay close attention to the lock icon/color of the URL bar? This advice seems to ignore the existence of sslstrip [0] and related attacks, and the numerous countermeasures that have been designed to deal with this problem (e.g. HSTS).
Re:Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the...
by blendo on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @12:28PM
(#8624994)
This is EXACTLY what I want for my intranet sites. It lets me protect my users from the wireshark in the next cubicle.
Re:Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the...
by tacticus on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @03:20PM
(#8626077)
The solution for this is to run your own CA internally and push out the cert to all the machines. (if you have byod stuff it makes it a little harder but you could still have an internal ca signing only a certain subdomain and get people ot install it)
Re:Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the...
by motoboi on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @01:37PM
(#8625439)
But that don't protect you from a malicious user hijacking this domain in the next cubicle. Perhaps, if your switches are not properly configured , that the guy in the next cubicle ou do some arp spoofing and https://intranet.yourdomain would be served by a bogus server collecting passwords.
But your users won't notice the difference, because they are used to see the certificate warning on his browser.
Re:Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the...
by jules on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:01AM
(#8629120)
How would a browser know that the fact that www.mybank.com doesn't use SSL at all is intended by the bank, or the result of a MITM attack? At the end of the day it all relies on the user seeing the (lack of) a padlock in his browser. So as long as you don't show a padlock (or a different kind of padlock) for www.mybank.com when the certificate is self signed, you're good.
How would you inform people going to www.mybank.com which is presenting a self-signed cert in a way that a) they clearly notice but that b) doesn't annoy you when you connect to www.myblog.com which also is presenting a self-signed cert?