Re:Norway Wealth Fund Outsmarts Flash Boys as Algorithms Aba...
by PhantomGremlin on Tuesday November 18, 2014 @01:57AM
(#8622747)
> Quoting and buying at their published bid/ask is precisely their function
I think he was making a little joke about this. He said:
fill my buy orders at the bid
and sell orders at the ask
I'm with him, I'd give all my business to someone who could do that. I could retire in one trading day if I could find someone to do that for me. This was exactly the downfall of Knight Capital Group. It only took about 45 minutes for them to lose $440 million.[1]Of course, that wasn't what you originally said, which was
a firm who agrees to buy at the bid
and sell at the ask
hence the smiley at the end of his comment. There's a difference between "buy at the bid" and "fill my buy orders at the bid". :)[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_Capital_Group#2012_stock...
1. Brokers don't only send orders to 3rd party market makers because they're being paid for order flow. You're right, they won't get order flow for free, but I didn't mean to imply that they did.
2. Quoting and buying at their published bid/ask is precisely their function. Possibly we're just disagreeing on terms. The SEC's website is fairly good at explaining this flow. http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/tradexec.htm
3. What I'm discussing is the actual mechanism for HOW nbbo is fulfilled. Competition in the marketplace -- third party market makers and arb firms -- absolutely play a role in ensuring the efficiency of the market. If brokers had to run this infrastructure themselves, it would be non-trivial and without any financial incentives that I can think of.