News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Emacs Power: remote servers and shell commands by DavidSJ on Monday October 05, 2009 @01:21AM (#861255)
In my experience, TRAMP is unbearably slow.
Re:Emacs Power: remote servers and shell commands by yason on Monday October 05, 2009 @01:54AM (#861293)
There's some natural and unavoidable latency due to ssh/smb/ftp/whatever you're using but I use tramp daily and in practice it's quite unnoticeable. Local machines respond immediately, machines in the same country are very much usable as well.

Just make tramp keep the connections alive longer and cache the password. And set backup directory to something local!

C-c C-s is still faster than using a shell in another console and scp/rsync.

Re:Emacs Power: remote servers and shell commands by davidw on Monday October 05, 2009 @04:51AM (#861447)
It's a tradeoff - it might be a little bit slower in opening a file, but then you get to edit it locally, which can be way better than using an editor on a remote machine through a slow link.
Re:Emacs Power: remote servers and shell commands by pqs on Monday October 05, 2009 @06:08AM (#861511)
my experience tells that over ftp it can be very slow, but over ssh it is fine.
Re:Emacs Power: remote servers and shell commands by DavidSJ on Monday October 05, 2009 @08:39AM (#861655)
I was referring to ssh.