Then, on top of that, they're moving the office to... Daly City?! Daly City is essentially the worst of all worlds: it's not really readily accessible to anyone -- and it's an undesirable eye sore on top of it. There are places that make no sense to relocate to that still make more sense than Daly City (e.g., Pleasanton, San Rafael, Alameda, Walnut Creek, Burlingame) -- Daly City is almost where you would locate a company if you simply hated the employees. So at that point, you do begin to wonder about the mental stability of the CEO: the choice of Daly City is so completely bizarre that it almost certainly reflects other things amiss in the way decisions are made.
104,739 residents (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daly_City,_California) would probably disagree.
Also, outside of San Francisco proper, Daly City is the only destination served by 4 BART lines.
Wouldn't it be much easier to commute by car there?
All the new buildings had poor transport links - they even tried to move the head office to "a shead at heathrow" which was stoped when the ex engineer CEO used "engineering" language to F off
I can see why that might be a divisive issue, but totally agree with DHH regarding the remote workers part.