News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AWS Lambda by dkarapetyan on Thursday November 13, 2014 @01:30PM (#8603118)
All these announcement are making me feel sorry for all the other players in the cloud game. The other guys don't even come close.
Re:AWS Lambda by Karunamon on Thursday November 13, 2014 @01:47PM (#8603255)
Agreed. However, Amazon's pricing and rather complicated infrastructure means that there will always be a market for people like the DigitalOcean's of the world (I just want a cheap VM, now).
Re:AWS Lambda by rodgerd on Thursday November 13, 2014 @02:56PM (#8603666)
I feel sorry for all the people in 5 - 10 years who discover Amazonis now in a position to charge monopoly rents.
Re:AWS Lambda by Apoplectic on Thursday November 13, 2014 @04:18PM (#8604173)
And yet, they don't. Compare that to Oracle. Plus, when Amazon makes a new cloud architecture that gets popular, others copy it. OpenStack will have this if need be in a year or two and then you can port to OS in 5 years when the rent goes up.

Oh, and FWIW, when has AWS raised a price? My servers have gotten cheaper every year I've had them with AWS (3).

Re:AWS Lambda by epowell101 on Saturday November 15, 2014 @08:37PM (#8613202)
Regarding OpenStack and something similar, there is the underlying workflow service (not quite the same I know) called Mistral. A project called StackStorm that is related but adds event handling and a rule engine launched a couple weeks ago.
Re:AWS Lambda by tekacs on Thursday November 13, 2014 @05:13PM (#8604488)
Though several of them run architectures on open technologies, which places them in a different situation entirely.