Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by jacquesm on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @02:14PM
(#8597514)
I would not hold it against you that you make a living with MS, that said in the present they do plenty of stuff that they really shouldn't. So it's not just the previous generation, the current one is also anything but clean.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by jasonlotito on Thursday November 13, 2014 @08:21AM
(#8601344)
One could say the same about companies and organizations that you admit to supporting as well.
So, if all choices are bad choices, what are you left with?
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by jacquesm on Thursday November 13, 2014 @11:03AM
(#8602213)
Untainted open source. There's plenty of it.
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by Sir_Blake on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @06:16PM
(#8598931)
What exactly are they doing today that you don't agree with?
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by nileshtrivedi on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @11:04PM
(#8599856)
Patent threats and lawsuits against Android OEMs.
Sabotaging the office document standard process at ISO.
Corruption in cases where governments explored switching to alternative operating systems.
Locking down computers using UEFI Secure Boot and taking control away from the owners of the machine.
among other things.
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by BuckRogers on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @09:00PM
(#8599538)
I'll answer that. No more than any other for-profit enterprise.