Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by yarou on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @02:13PM
(#8597509)
Perhaps obligation is a poor word choice. I meant it more in the sense of the invisible hand and rationality. As a rational actor, Microsoft was maximizing their utility, given whatever their utility function/curve is.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft takes .NET open source and cross-platform
by jacquesm on Wednesday November 12, 2014 @02:19PM
(#8597548)
By that reason we should all go into the drugs trade. I don't buy that for a second. Rational actors are not normally driven to illegal behavior unless someone makes a decision to that effect saying 'damn the consequences, let's commit this crime'. That's a very dangerous line to cross. It came within a whisker of getting Microsoft to be broken up and I can't believe that they would have taken that risk if they knew that was a possible consequence. And I firmly believe they should have been broken up, that would have sent a strong signal that anti-competitive behavior is not acceptable. Instead, now we have a bigger mess.