News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on An Update on Hacker News. Parent comment

Re:An Update on Hacker News by gregpilling on Monday November 10, 2014 @06:58PM (#8587450)
"It is one of the main reasons that I would never consciously leave a comment up if it reaches -3, even if I stand by it 100%, it's important, and the community happens to be wrong in its groupthink and I clearly have explained why. I would delete it instead."

I am confused. Your preferred path is to avoid conflict such that you would rather delete than be disagreed with? If your opinion differs from groupthink, you would make it go away? I guess that is similar to not posting in the first place (because of groupthink you disagree with) , just retroactive.

Probably better than my not posting in the first place :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:An Update on Hacker News by redacted on Monday November 10, 2014 @08:21PM (#8587722)
His point, one that I strongly agree with, is that the threat of being hellbanned for comments that get downvoted is enough to stifle discussion on HN. Honestly, how often do you see passionate debate in HN comments?
[ Parent | on HN ]
[deleted]
Re:An Update on Hacker News by maxerickson on Monday November 10, 2014 @09:02PM (#8587859)
My interpretation is at least a disagreement about whether the technique is effective. If your attempt at improving the discussion looks more or less the same as whining about downvotes, it's going to get interpreted as whining about downvotes.

edit: I guess the thread was getting cluttered and argumentative.

[ Parent | on HN ]