News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stack Free Recursion (1995). Parent comment

Re:Stack Free Recursion (1995) by LukeShu on Sunday November 09, 2014 @12:59PM (#8580370) 

    > It will still need a stack of return addresses
Keep reading, further down he even gets rid of the stack of return addresses.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stack Free Recursion (1995) by barrkel on Sunday November 09, 2014 @01:33PM (#8580465)
No; the stack of return addresses is required when the variable mutations don't have a consistent inverse.
[ Parent | on HN ]