Re:Global Web Crackdown Arrests 17, Seizes Hundreds Of Dark ...
by mike_hearn on Friday November 07, 2014 @01:30PM
(#8573924)
You don't even need to take them offline. Just send them a lot of traffic: done.
QUANTUM + XKEYSCORE + some MapReductions would make mincemeat of this problem.
Re:Global Web Crackdown Arrests 17, Seizes Hundreds Of Dark ...
by venomsnake on Friday November 07, 2014 @10:00AM
(#8572766)
Actually a relay will be awesome way to mask a hidden service, if TOR encryption holds.
Re:Global Web Crackdown Arrests 17, Seizes Hundreds Of Dark ...
by mike-cardwell on Friday November 07, 2014 @11:38AM
(#8573319)
No, it is an extremely bad idea to do that:
http://cybermashup.com/2013/09/04/dont-run-a-tor-router-and-...
And something a little more "official" from https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-hidden-service.html.en -
"It is generally a better idea to host hidden services on a Tor client rather than a Tor relay, since relay uptime and other properties are publicly visible."
That is one of the reasons why you're absolutely not supposed to run a relay from the same IP that you run a hidden service from. Because your IP is published if you do that.
If I were to run such a service, I would want to make sure that the IP that the hidden service is running from has as little connection to me as possible.
[edit] If it were my full time job to locate Tor hidden services, I'm pretty sure I could make a decent go of it. Certainly for a lot of them. Given the resources the NSA and GCHQ have, I have to believe that they can do a much better job of it.