[dead]
Re:Why Intel is adding instructions to speed up non-volatile...
by 6cxs2hd6 on Thursday November 06, 2014 @09:30AM
(#8567112)
I'm downvoting your comment because
- that seems to be copy and pasted (i.e. plagiarized) from the original blog post http://danluu.com/clwb-pcommit/
- your submission history suggests you are associated with improgrammer.net
Re:Why Intel is adding instructions to speed up non-volatile...
by acqq on Thursday November 06, 2014 @09:52AM
(#8567201)
Yes, it is 100% plagiarized. The last sentence in the original text:
"It doesn’t directly address the OS overhead issue, but that can, to a large extent, be worked around without extra hardware."
Their modification:
"It doesn’t directly address the OS overhead issue, but that can, to an astronomically immense extent, be worked around without extra hardware."
Re:Why Intel is adding instructions to speed up non-volatile...
by 8957a7e86 on Thursday November 06, 2014 @12:22PM
(#8568172)
It looks like the original text was automatically processed by replacing various words by their synonyms from a thesaurus, leading to hilariously non-idiomatic prose.